Archive for the ‘Coup 2006’ Category
06BANGKOK6004 AMBASSADOR PRESSES CDR ON TRANSITION
“80137″,”9/29/2006 10:28″,”06BANGKOK6004″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,”CONFIDENTIAL”,
“06BANGKOK5973|06BANGKOK6003″,”VZCZCXRO4602
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #6004/01 2721028
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 291028Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1993
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6103
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 1534
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 2154
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1192
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY”,
“C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BANGKOK 006004
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
TREASURY PASS TO FRB SAN FRANCISCO/TERESA CURRAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/29/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, KDEM, MOPS, ASEC, TH
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR PRESSES CDR ON TRANSITION
REF: A. BANGKOK 6003 (CONSTITUTION CONCERNS)
B. BANGKOK 5973 (MEETING WITH SURAYUD)
Classified By: Ambassador Ralph L. Boyce, reason 1.4 (d).
SUMMARY
——-
1. (C) The Ambassador on September 29 pressed Council for
Democratic Reform (CDR) Secretary General Winai Phattiyakul
to address concerns that CDR members would retain substantial
influence after the promulgation of the interim constitution.
Winai explained that certain provisions of the interim
constitution would be more moderate than critics feared (ref
A). Detained members of Thaksin\’s cabinet would soon be
released, but there was no timetable for the restoration of
full civil liberties. Winai asked that the USG put faith in
Privy Councilor Surayud, who seems nearly certain to become
the next Prime Minister. Winai seemed unwilling to
contemplate accelerating elections, as he explained the
difficulty in creating a new democratic system that would not
be as easy to manipulate as that established by the 1997
constitution. End Summary.
TIME FRAME FOR DEVELOPMENTS
—————————
2. (C) The Ambassador called on CDR Secretary General Winai
on September 29, to discuss progress toward a transition to a
civilian government and to express concern about rumored
provisions of the interim constitution. (Ref A provides more
detail on those provisions.) Winai opened the conversation
by noting that the interim constitution would be finalized on
September 30; then, CDR leader General Sonthi would name the
next Prime Minister. The King\’s endorsement of the Prime
Minister could come as early as October 1, or as late as
October 4. The Ambassador noted that October 4 would be
later than the CDR\’s self-imposed two week deadline; however,
Winai believed Wednesday, October 4, represented the
conclusion of the second week after General Sonthi\’s
announcement on Wednesday, September 20, of the deadline.
FORMING THE NEXT CABINET
————————
3. (C) The Ambassador asked whether the next Prime Minister
would be able to select his own cabinet. Winai said that the
Prime Minister would have the freedom to do so, but the CDR
would recommend some names and set certain standards.
Cabinet members should have \”no political background\” (i.e.,
should not be tied to the Thaksin administration); they
should be well-respected, honest figures who appeal to the
Thai people. The cabinet members also should understand that
their mandate is to improve economic conditions, bring into
being a new constitution, and \”fix the path\” so that Thailand
has an improved democracy within one year.
COMMENTS ON SURAYUD
——————-
4. (C) The Ambassador remarked that, if Privy Councilor
Surayud Chulanont were to become Prime Minister, concerns
would inevitably arise because of the fact of Surayud\’s
military background. Winai urged the Ambassador not to judge
a book by its cover; it was important to understand that
Surayud had the right mentality to lead Thailand at this time.
PROVISIONS OF THE INTERIM CONSTITUTION
————————————–
5. (C) The Ambassador asked whether, as rumored (ref A), the
CDR, after transforming itself into the Council on National
Security (CNS), would select the 100 members of the
Constitutional Drafting Council (CDC). Winai said the CNS
would indeed select the members, but the members would select
BANGKOK 00006004 002 OF 003
from among themselves 35 members for the drafting committee.
6. (C) The Ambassador asked whether the interim civilian
government would be subordinate to the CNS. Winai replied:
\”No way at all it will be subordinate. It will be a
partnership.\” The Ambassador then asked whether the CNS
would have a seat in the cabinet. Winai relied, \”Not at all.\”
7. (C) When asked who would choose the members of the interim
parliament, Winai said that the government and the CNS would
cooperate in the selection process. The Ambassador asked if
the interim parliament would be able to hold a no-confidence
debate. Winai said the parliament could indeed have a
no-confidence debate, but it would not be able to hold a
no-confidence vote. Winai appeared to envision the threat of
a debate as an effective check on the Prime Minister and his
cabinet, but he said a public airing of views would suffice;
there would be no need for a vote, because the interim
government would be in place for \”less than one year.\”
POLITICAL RIGHTS TO REMAIN SUSPENDED
————————————
8. (C) The Ambassador asked whether the decrees issued by the
CDR would remain in effect after the promulgation of the
interim constitution. Winai asserted that those decrees
would no longer be in effect, except for prohibitions on
political activities, which would persist until the lifting
of martial law, or until determined otherwise by the
government. Winai declined to predict when the population
would be allowed to resume political activities, but he said
the CNS would try to restore them as quickly as possible. He
also asserted that the interim constitution would include the
bill of rights from the 1997 constitution.
DETAINEES TO BE RELEASED
————————
9. (C) The Ambassador asked about persons associated with the
Thaksin administration who had been detained without charges
by the security forces. Winai said that they would be
allowed to return to their families \”at the end of this week.\”
ACCELERATING TRANSITION
———————–
10. (C) The Ambassador noted the CNS would likely face
pressure to speed up the timetable for elections. Winai
urged the Ambassador to understand the political environment:
Thaksin had been able to manipulate all the supposedly
independent bodies created by the 1997 constitution,
destroying Thailand\’s system of checks and balances. Thaksin
had shown that \”anyone with a few billion U.S. dollars can
take over Thailand easily.\” It would not be easy for the
next administration to create independent mechanisms that
would work effectively \”for the next round of democracy.\”
This would require time.
11. (C) Winai urged the Ambassador to convey to Washington
that the CDR members did not aspire for power. Using
military force to bring about political change had damaged
the country, Winai acknowledged — but the Generals had
assessed that if they had not acted, the damage would be even
greater. If you see that a train is heading for a wreck, it
is justifiable to take a detour in order to avoid a
collision. Winai urged that the USG not push the Generals
into a corner, but rather help them to create a democratic
government featuring effective checks and balances.
COMMENT
——-
12. (C) It appears some provisions of the interim
constitution have been softened since the circulation of an
initial draft (ref A). We are encouraged by Winai\’s
BANGKOK 00006004 003 OF 003
assurance that detained former cabinet ministers will be
released very soon; however, we are dismayed that he could
offer no similar assurance about the full restoration of
civil liberties. Winai clearly feels Surayud is the right
man to steer Thailand through this difficult period, and we
also note that, as one who enjoys the trust of the CDR,
Surayud will likely have more authority vis-a-vis the
Generals than someone lacking a military background would.
Winai made it clear that the new administration intends to
stick to its timeframe for the process of drafting a new
constitution and holding elections.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK6002 CENTRAL BANK GOVERNOR EMERGES AS TOP ECONOMIC ADVISER TO CDR, PUSHES ACTIVIST AGENDA FOR SOON TO BE APPOINTED GOVERNMENT
“80128″,”9/29/2006 10:03″,”06BANGKOK6002″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,”CONFIDENTIAL”,”",”VZCZCXRO4557
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #6002/01 2721003
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 291003Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1988
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY”,”C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BANGKOK 006002
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT PASS USTR FOR BWEISEL AND JJENSEN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/29/2016
TAGS: ECON, PGOV, PINS, PHUM, MOPS, ASEC, TH
SUBJECT: CENTRAL BANK GOVERNOR EMERGES AS TOP ECONOMIC
ADVISER TO CDR, PUSHES ACTIVIST AGENDA FOR SOON TO BE
APPOINTED GOVERNMENT
Classified By: Ambassador Ralph Boyce, Reason 1.4 (b) (d)
1. (C) Summary: In a September 28 meeting with the
Ambassador, Bank of Thailand Governor Pridiyathorn Devakula
stated his intention to be the prime economic adviser to the
soon to be appointed interim Prime Minister (reportedly,
General Surayud Chulanond). He confirmed the CDR\’s
commitment to stick to the announced timetable for a return
to a democratically elected government. The BOT Governor
affirmed the military\’s plans to remain politically active
during the interim governing period, arguing that the
situation in the Muslim south and the possibility of a
Thaksin-inspired countercoup warrant this. In contrast to
some, he advocates an activist agenda for the interim
government, with the priorities being reform of the
government\’s rice export program; mass transit; an
anti-corruption drive; and energy efficiency.
2. Pridiyathorn is joined at the hip with the CDR; in
speaking of the coup leaders, he repeatedly used the word
\”we.\” For the next year or so, Pridiyathorn looks to be
Thailand\’s economic supremo and effective Number Two in the
government. The BOT Governor\’s activist agenda is markedly
different from the views of others who have been appointed to
the CDR\’s economic advisory council, who counsel a minimalist
approach that would allow a future democratically elected
government maximum flexibility in choosing its priorities.
End Summary.
3. (C) On September 28 the Ambassador (accompanied by
Embassy Economic Counselor) met with Pridiyathorn Devakula,
Governor of the Bank of Thailand. Pridiyathorn has emerged
as the principal economic adviser to the military government
(CDR) and has been named as the chair of an economic advisory
panel appointed by the CDR. Thai media earlier had tipped
the BOT Governor as a leading candidate for appointment by
the CDR as Prime Minister.
\”I Expected A Coup\”
3. (C) Pridiyathorn said that he had expected a coup: \”The
situation had developed to an advanced stage, and I along
with everyone else was relieved when it (the coup) happened.\”
Even his U.S.-educated son, he said, was relieved (\”after we
had a talk\”) that the military had stepped in.
4. (C) The Ambassador said that it was important that a
Prime Minister be appointed as soon as possible (\”preferably
now\”), and certainly no later than the within two weeks
timeframe pledged by the CDR. Pridiyathorn replied that the
drafting of the new interim constitution, primarily by
prominent legal expert Meechai Ruchupan, is just about
complete. This document will be sent to the King for
signature \”maybe on Saturday (September 30), and then we will
appoint a PM.\”
\”I Won\’t Be PM\”, (But Surayud Will Be)
5. (C) Pridiyathorn told the Ambassador, \”I won\’t be the
PM.\” He added, however, \”I\’ll be part of the interim
government.\” Pridiyathorn admitted that he had spoken with
the military leaders before the coup: \”They came to me and
said, \’You\’re neutral, we want your help.\’ I don\’t belong to
any political party; I am working for the country.\” He
predicted that Privy Councilor Surayut Chulanond (a retired
Army General) would be appointed PM on Sunday (October 1).
The Ambassador noted the likely perception and skepticism of
the international community in reaction to the appointment by
the coup leaders of a retired army general as the new
civilian PM. He also stressed the importance of adhering to
the 180-day deadline for the drafting of a new constitution
and early elections. Pridiyathorn agreed, and stated that
the CDR was committed to this timetable.
\”A Fighter, Not a Thinker\”
6. (C) The Ambassador noted that everyone he had spoken
with regards (coup leader) General Sonthi as a good, honest,
straightforward person. Pridiyathorn replied, \”Sonthi is a
fighter, not a thinker. He sees this as a mission to be
accomplished, and then he returns to the barracks.\” The
Ambassador said that he had spoken with former Thai Prime
BANGKOK 00006002 002 OF 003
Minister Anand Panyarachun about his experiences when he was
appointed as a civilian PM by a military government in the
early 1990\’s: Anand told the Ambassador that the two biggest
mistakes that were made during that period were 1) the
military appointed Anand but remained in place, and 2) the
military, and not Anand, appointed the national assembly.
Both of these mistakes, said the Ambassador, now are being
repeated by the CDR. Pridiyathorn replied that the
appointment of the national assembly will be a joint effort
between the CDR and the new PM. As for the military
remaining in place, Pridiyathorn said that the CDR \”doesn\’t
trust the situation; we are still worried about a
countercoup.\” The Ambassador suggested that the new PM could
improve Thailand\’s image by lifting martial law; Pridiyathorn
replied that \”Our intelligence shows that the TRT is trying
to organize resistance.\”
7. (C) In response to a question from the Ambassador,
Pridiyathorn said that the best way to portray the new PM to
Washington is that his background and relationship with the
CDR will hasten the military\’s return to the barracks. \”This
departure from politics,\” he said, \”is everyone\’s intention.\”
Priorities of the Interim Government
8. (C) Pridiyathorn said that he had discussed the
possibility of being appointed as PM, but priorities argued
against this action: \”The economy is easy — we can grow GDP
at 4-5 percent without too much trouble. The main challenges
to the interim government will be 1) the risk of a
pro-Thaksin countercoup; and 2) the security situation in the
Muslim south. I spoke with someone higher than the CDR
(Embassy Comment: Privy Councilor Prem?) and told him that
it is not right to put an economist at the top. I can be
Number Two.\” Pridiyathorn added that his exact title in the
interim government has not been finalized. He will not
remain as BOT Governor, but will be replaced by BOT Deputy
Governor Tarisa Watanagase. After serving with the interim
government for one year, Pridiyathorn said that he planned to
retire.
9. (C) The BOT Governor outlined a fairly activist agenda
for the incoming interim government. He rated four issues as
priorities: reform of the rice export program; mass transit;
corruption; and energy efficiency.
Reform of the Rice Export Program
10. (C) Pridiyathorn charged that the previous government\’s
rice export program was rife with corruption, and had been
used to buy rural votes. The pre-TRT government had a policy
of taking delivery of farmers\’ rice and paying them 80
percent of the anticipated market value immediately, with the
remainder paid when the rice was sold. Under Thaksin\’s TRT
government, the initial payment price was increased, first to
90 percent in 2002, then to 100 percent in 2003, then to 120
percent in 2004, and 130 percent in 2005. According to
Pridiyathorn, the payments above 100 percent were used to pay
off TRT campaign workers. The BOT Governor said that the
highly lucrative terms offered by the government had diverted
rice away from export-oriented private buyers, causing Thai
rice exports to fall by 25 percent in 2005. Vietnam, he
said, now exports almost as much rice as Thailand. The
policy had also created a huge (nine million tons) stockpile
of rice in government storage facilities. \”Now,\” said
Pridiyathorn, \”we have to get rid of it before the quality
deteriorates, by selling it at a loss.\” (Comment: While we
cannot vouch for the accuracy of Pridiyathorn\’s specific
charges, farm credit experts here acknowledge serious
problems and lack of transparency in the government\’s rice
credit payments program. End Comment.)
Mass Transit
11. (C) Pridiyathorn thinks the interim government must
commit to large scale mass transit projects. He acknowledged
that the Democrat Party (which controls the Bangkok city
government) is opposed, but maintained that \”we must convince
the public of the need to do this.\”
Corruption
BANGKOK 00006002 003 OF 003
12. (C) The BOT Governor said that the interim government
will vigorously investigate and prosecute corruption in
government dealings, particularly procurements.
Energy Efficiency
13. (C) Pridiyathorn said that although he had not had a
chance to talk with PM-to-be Surayut about the subject, he
thinks \”he (Sirayud) will agree with me that we have to
address energy efficiency.\” Noting that Thailand ranks by
some measures as the most energy inefficient country in the
world, Pridiyathorn vowed to reduce Thailand\’s excessive
dependence on trucks and move to multi-modal transport
involving trains and containers. While admitting that
conversion to a less truck-intensive transport system is a
long term project, Pridiyathorn said that a good start could
be made in the next 12 months by building container yards
next to railroads: \”By starting this and other big projects
now, we can dictate the future course of Thailand\’s
development.\”
Comment
14. (C) Pridiyathorn obviously is joined at the hip with the
CDR; in speaking of the coup leaders and their plans, he
repeatedly used the word \”we.\” For the next year or so,
Pridiyathorn looks to be Thailand\’s economic supremo. The
BOT Governor\’s activist agenda for the interim government is
markedly different from the views of other economic advisory
council appointees, who counsel a minimalist approach that
would allow a future democratically elected government
maximum flexibility in choosing its priorities.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5973 THAILAND COUP: SONTHI ASKS SURAYUD TO BE INTERIM PRIME MINISTER
“79989″,”9/28/2006 11:03″,
“06BANGKOK5973″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,”CONFIDENTIAL”,”",
“VZCZCXRO2963
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #5973/01 2711103
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 281103Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1952
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 6098
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 2150
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC”,”C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 005973
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR P, EAP, EAP/MLS
NSC FOR WILDER, MORROW
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/28/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, TH
SUBJECT: THAILAND COUP: SONTHI ASKS SURAYUD TO BE INTERIM
PRIME MINISTER
Classified By: Ambassador Ralph L. Boyce. Reason 1.4 (B,D)
1. (C) I called on retired General and Privy Councilor
Surayud Chulanont at the Privy Council Chambers on September
28. Surayud began by apologizing for telling me on the night
of the coup that he did not know of anything going on that
night. He maintains that when we spoke, he was on his way
home from a palace religious ceremony–attended by Privy
Council head Prem–for the Queen\’s late mother. After
returning home, he had turned on the TV and saw Thaksin\’s
attempt to declare emergency rule and fire Army Chief Sonthi.
At that point, Prem called and instructed him to \”come to
the palace.\”
2. (C) Turning to the current state of affairs, Surayud
explained that on the evening of September 27, General Sonthi
Boonyaratklin had come to his residence and asked him to be
the interim Prime Minister. Surayud responded that he didn\’t
really want the post, but if the King approved it, he
obviously would take the position. I responded to this by
saying that \”you and I both know what will happen;\” Surayud
will take the job. We shared a laugh over the frustrating
nature of the position: a difficult job for 8-10 months that
angers many people and then you get kicked out.
3. (C) Surayud reiterated the common assertion by many Thai
that the coup was \”the only way out.\” Thai politics were at
\”a total stalemate.\” Surayud hopes that the coup, in
hindsight, will be seen as one step back, but two steps
forward for Thai democracy. I told Surayud that he is the
right person for the job in this difficult situation. As PM,
he will make it possible for the Council for National
Security (CNS, the CDRM\’s new name under the pending interim
constitution) to step back and permit the interim civilian
government to have more authority and leeway to pave the way
towards the restoration of an elected government. If a
civilian technocrat such as banker Pridyathorn or UNCTAD
Chief Supachai had been selected, that may have sent a better
initial signal to foreign observers, but would not have
inspired the CNS to take a more hands-off role.
4. (C) I added that most people felt that it would be
defensible for the CNS to retain certain, circumscribed
powers, allowing them to guard against a counter-coup or to
improve security in the troubled South. However, several
articles in the draft interim constitution that we have seen
allow the CNS to have final say in the selection of ministers
and drafters for the new constitution. Moreover, the clause
preventing members of the interim parliament and
constitutional commission from running for office in the next
two years had reportedly been dropped. These problematic
elements, frankly, run counter to otherwise positive signs
that GEN Sonthi intends to make good on his pledge to \”get
out\” of politics. Surayud agreed, adding that he had argued
that the CNS should step back as much as possible. According
to Surayud, Sonthi does not want political power.
5. (C) Turning to the public reaction to Surayud\’s new role,
I explained that some are likely to criticize the selection
of a former Army Chief as Prime Minister. Others may
criticize the selection of a sitting Privy Councilor as an
indication that the King is calling the shots. Surayud
responded by noting that a retired military officer is a
civilian, adding, \”I challenge anyone to look at my military
record and find problems with it.\”
6. (C) I reviewed the USG response to the coup, including our
strong public criticism. Surayud said he understood
perfectly. I explained that Washington was examining a
suspension of assistance under Section 508. Surayud
acknowledged this, saying it was \”just like in 1991.\”
Surayud explained that the interim constitution is scheduled
for release by Royal Proclamation on September 29, with the
announcement of the new PM next Monday or Tuesday. I noted
that October 3 will be day 14 following the coup, and that it
is important that Sonthi and the CDRM hold to their
self-imposed two week target to appoint a civilian
government. Surayud agreed and believes that they are doing
just that. Finally, Surayud asked that if his new position
BANGKOK 00005973 002 OF 002
does come to pass, he would welcome an early call on him.
COMMENT
——-
7. (C) Surayud is a well-respected, non-partisan figure with
a sterling track record as a professional military officer.
After PM Chuan Leekpai selected him to lead the Army in 1998,
Surayud undertook a meaningful series of military reforms
that served to professionalize and de-politicize the
uniformed ranks. During his tenure as Army Chief, Surayud
also managed to push back against Burmese incursions into
Thai territory, while ending Thai efforts to push Karen
refugees over the border. The CDRM has obviously reached out
to Surayud because he is one of the few individuals with the
credentials and prestige to unite the country in this
troubled period. Under the current circumstances, Surayud is
arguably the best person to head the interim civilian
government. He is trusted by the palace and the military,
and enjoys widespread respect across a broad spectrum of Thai
citizens because of his integrity and previous service. His
appointment would be a very positive development for Thailand
internally, as well as for Thai-U.S. relations, and we should
welcome it if and when it is announced.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5972 DEMOCRAT PARTY LEADER DISCUSSES COUP AFTERMATH
“79986″,”9/28/2006 10:57″,”06BANGKOK5972″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,”CONFIDENTIAL”,”06BANGKOK5949″,”VZCZCXRO2940
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #5972/01 2711057
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 281057Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1949
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6095
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 1530
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 2147
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1189
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY”,
“C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BANGKOK 005972
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
TREASURY PASS TO FRB SAN FRANCISCO/TERESA CURRAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/26/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, KDEM, MOPS, ASEC, TH
SUBJECT: DEMOCRAT PARTY LEADER DISCUSSES COUP AFTERMATH
REF: BANGKOK 5949 (SEPT 27 UPDATE)
Classified By: Ambassador Ralph L. Boyce, reason 1.4 (d).
SUMMARY
——-
1. (C) Democrat Party (DP) leader Abhisit Vejjajiva expressed
confidence that Council for Democratic Reform (CDR) leader
General Sonthi would happily relinquish power, but Abhisit
thought the CDR would have difficulty restoring full civil
liberties until taking measures against key Thaksin
administration figures. In a September 28 discussion with
the Ambassador, Abhisit said the prospective selection of
Privy Councilor Surayud Chulanont would best enable the
withdrawal of the military from political life. Abhisit
expressed confidence that his party\’s image had improved in
recent months, but he did not foresee the disintegration of
Thaksin\’s Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party. Nevertheless, Abhisit
felt that any significant realignment of politicians would
await the promulgation of the interim constitution and the
formation of the interim civilian administration. Abhisit
also pressed on USG interest in restarting negotiation of a
free trade agreement with the interim civilian
administration, and he noted former Foreign Minister Surin
Pitsuwan\’s availability for the position of UN Secretary
General. End Summary.
CONCERNED ABOUT THAKSIN\’S SIDE, NOT SONTHI
——————————————
2. (C) Receiving the Ambassador at Democrat Party
headquarters, Abhisit opened the meeting characterizing
himself as \”concerned\” about the current political situation.
Abhisit said that, based on his knowledge of General
Sonthi\’s character, he was confident Sonthi had not carried
out the September 19 coup in order to put himself in a
position of power. However, Abhisit worried that Thaksin
loyalists would try reasserting themselves in political life,
and this possibility would make it difficult for the CDR to
restore full civil liberties. Thaksin\’s wife, Potjaman, had
recently withdrawn 20 million Baht (approximately 540,000
USD) in cash, and some of this money would surely be used to
gain influence with members of the interim government, if not
members of the CDR itself. Abhisit surmised that Thaksin
loyalists likely had instigated the September 26 burning of
schools in Kamphengphet (reftel).
3. (C) Abhisit said that it probably would be necessary for
the government to prosecute corrupt Thaksin administration
figures, in order to calm the situation sufficiently to allow
full restoration of civil liberties. Toward that end,
Abhisit requested that the Ambassador provide the CDR with
further information about potential irregularities involved
in the RTG\’s purchase from General Electric of CTX explosives
detection equipment. If the USG could provide the names of
corrupt politicians connected to that purchase, this could
provide a basis for further RTG investigation, with a
salutary effect on the political environment.
BULLISH ON SURAYUD
——————
4. (C) Privy Councilor Surayud Chulanont probably represented
the best candidate for interim Prime Minister, Abhisit
averred, even though one of the other potential candidates,
UN Conference on Trade and Development Secretary General
Supachai Panitchpakdi, had longstanding ties to the Democrat
Party. Contrasting Supachai\’s training in economics with
Surayud\’s Army career, Abhisit said that the military
probably could not soon \”return to the barracks\” under an
interim Prime Minister with a purely civilian background,
like Supachai.
5. (C) Abhisit observed that there was substantial wrangling
BANGKOK 00005972 002 OF 003
over key elements of the interim constitution. Early drafts
had included provisions that would bar members of the CDR,
the interim legislature, and the constitutional drafting
assembly from seeking political positions for a two-year
period. Abhisit thought such provisions would send the right
signal. However, lead interim constitution drafter Meechai
Ruchuphan had altered those provisions so as to remove any
restriction on members of the CDR and most others in the
interim government. The Ambassador expressed the importance
of the CDR transitioning to a civilian-led government as soon
as possible, and doing so in a way that would reassure the
international community that the CDR members were not intent
on remaining in power.
TRT LIKELY TO REMAIN, BUT DP LOOKING GOOD
—————————————–
6. (C) The Ambassador asked Abhisit\’s view of the future of
TRT. Abhisit believed Thaksin\’s party would remain part of
the political landscape. Pending lawsuits that might have
resulted in the dissolution of TRT and the Democrat Party
(for improprieties in the April 2006 election) would likely
become moot now that the CDR had scrapped the 1997
Constitution and the associated legal framework. Some in TRT
would be tempted to use the referendum on the next
constitution to try to demonstrate popular opposition to the
September 19 coup, thereby regaining some political momentum,
Abhisit commented.
7. (C) When asked whether he expected an influx of TRT
figures into the Democrat Party, Abhisit said most
politicians were waiting to see how the constitution and
other aspects of the political system would look before
making a move. He had been in contact with some TRT figures
prior to the coup, and there were some people (NFI) he would
like to bring over to the DP if the CDR did not include them
in the interim cabinet. But Abhisit was reluctant to sully
the DP\’s image by recruiting TRT figures with tainted
reputations, and those who were clean lacked the influence to
boost the DP\’s prospects in a meaningful way.
8. (C) Even before the coup, DP research had shown the
party\’s image was improving, and not simply because the DP
was the principal alternative to TRT. Polling showed the gap
between the DP and TRT narrowing from 32 percent to 13
percent. Abhisit claimed a \”massive shift\” in public
perception of the Democrats, who were increasingly seen as
having meaningful policies and ideas, caring for the poor,
and being responsive to the people\’s needs. However, Abhisit
acknowledged the DP had trailed TRT in terms of projecting
strong leadership and an ability to achieve its goals.
9. (C) Abhisit lamented the success of the Chavalit
administration (in the mid 1990\’s) in painting the DP as a
party of the South and the wealthy. This image persisted to
the present day in the Northeast, Thailand\’s most populous
region. Abhisit was more optimistic about gaining strength
in central and northern Thailand, noting that, had elections
been held in late 2006, he would have anticipated winning
four of ten seats in Chiang Mai, Thaksin\’s home province
(where the DP won 18 percent of the vote in 2005). In the
northern province of Mae Hong Son, the DP could have won a
majority of the seats at stake, Abhisit projected.
10. (C) Even assuming TRT\’s continued existence, it would not
be impossible for the DP to win a plurality in the next
national election, Abhisit said. The key would be for the
vote in the Northeast to be split. Abhisit noted that the
Chart Thai party, or even the newly-formed Pracharat Party of
former Interior Minister Sanoh Thienthong, might pull a
meaningful number of votes from TRT in the Northeast.
FTA
—
BANGKOK 00005972 003 OF 003
11. (C) Abhisit pressed the Ambassador on whether the USG
would be able to negotiate a free trade agreement with the
interim government. When the Ambassador noted that
negotiations had effectively ended once Thaksin dissolved
parliament and became caretaker Prime Minister, Abhisit
indicated his focus was not on political optics but on legal
restrictions. The DP was watching closely the prospects of a
U.S.-Thai FTA, Abhisit said, implying that the party might
reconsider its previous opposition now that Thaksin\’s
administration would no longer be positioned to profit from
the agreement.
SURIN PITSUWAN\’S OPTIONS
————————
12. (C) Abhisit noted that former Foreign Minister Surin
Pitsuwan had been rumored as a potential candidate for
Foreign Minister in the soon-to-be-formed interim government.
One possible scenario involved the inclusion of both Surin
Pitsuwan and former TRT Deputy Prime Minister and Commerce
Minister Somkid Jatusripitak in the interim cabinet; this
scenario included Privy Council President Prem Tinsulanonda
becoming interim Prime Minister, Abhisit relayed, since Prem
had extensive experience dealing with political party
figures. Other scenarios even included Surin heading the
interim government, Abhisit said, while Surin also had made
it clear that he was available for the position of UN
Secretary General. Abhisit joked that, while ASEAN candidate
SIPDIS
Surakiart Sathirathai might appear opportunistic in having
jumped from Thaksin\’s camp to the CDR\’s, this quick shift
might demonstrate Surakiart\’s suitability to become UNSYG,
because it showed he could work with all sides in a dispute.
COMMENT
——-
13. (C) Abhisit appears to be among the many in Bangkok who
see the September 19 coup as a necessary step to rid the
country of Thaksin. He did not appear particularly troubled
by the current limitations on civil liberties and political
party activities, but he clearly anticipated that these would
be relaxed in the near future, especially if the CDR were to
install an interim Prime Minister capable of controlling the
security environment and containing the lingering influence
of Thaksin\’s loyalists.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5949 THAILAND UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 27
“79849″,”9/27/2006 11:18″,
“06BANGKOK5949″,”Embassy Bangkok”,
“CONFIDENTIAL”,”",”VZCZCXRO1752
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #5949/01 2701118
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 271118Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1929
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 6093
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 2145
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC”,”C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 005949
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
TREASURY PASS TO FRB SAN FRANCISCO/TERESA CURRAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/26/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, TH
SUBJECT: THAILAND UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 27
Classified By: DCM Alexander A. Arvizu, reason 1.4 (b) (d)
1. (C) SUMMARY: The Council on Democratic Reform (CDR) says
it will announce the interim prime minister on Sunday. Privy
Councillor and retired General Surayud Chulanond appears to
be the lead candidate again, and many contacts anticipate he
will be chosen. The CDR announced the establishment of four
advisory councils composed of many respected civil society
leaders, perhaps in an effort to co-opt potential critics. If
so, the effort did not work; \”members\” were not consulted in
advance and several declined to participate. Several noted
jurists who helped draft the interim Constitution have
withdrawn from any further role assisting the CDR — at
least, officially — in response to public criticism of their
previous service in the Thaksin government. Former Defense
Minister Thamarak appears to \”under the control\” of the CDR,
although staying in his own home. END SUMMARY.
INTERIM PRIME MINISTER – GENERAL SURAYUD?
—————————————–
2. (C) Speculation has turned back to Privy Councillor and
retired General Surayud Chulanont as the leading candidate to
be the interim Prime Minister. Surayud\’s name has come up
repeatedly during the prolonged political crisis of the past
year as a possible replacement for Thaksin, particularly when
the opposition was pushing for the King to name a prime
minister by invoking Article 7 of the Constitution. On the
positive side, Surayud is very widely respected across the
economic and geographic lines dividing the country. He is
unlikely to be viewed as seeking power for himself. The
negatives are just as obvious: as a retired General, he is
technically civilian, but choosing a retired military officer
will not be well-received by the international community.
Also, Surayud, as a privy councillor, is also identified with
the King, which could complicate efforts by the CDR and other
Thai officials to dispel the rumors that the King was behind
the coup. Nonetheless, for today, at least, Surayud seems to
be the front-runner. The CDR says that they will announce
the new PM on Sunday.
3. (C) According to a local academic, the CDR tried, and
failed, to get Privy Council President Prem Tinsulanonda to
give advice on the PM candidates. According to the
professor, Prem would not indicate a preference, but only
said that the interim PM should be \”brave, honest, and
loyal.\” The professor also opined that Surayud was the most
likely candidate, dismissing UNCTAD deputy head Supachai and
other candidates as lacking the stature needed to do the job.
CDR FORMS ADVISORY BODIES, FAILS TO CONSULT ADVISORS
——————————————— ——-
4. (C) The media reported that the CDR on September 26 formed
four advisory committees, covering economic affairs; foreign
affairs; reconciliation and social justice; and ethics,
governance, and the prevention of corruption and abuse of
power. It appears from both press reports and private
conversations with contacts that the CDR did not consult most
members before including them on these committees. Academics
have substantial representation on the committees, as no less
than 32 of the 66 members are professors, assistant
professors, or associate professors. Bank of Thailand
Governor Pridiyathorn Devakula, rumored as a potential Prime
Minister, heads the advisory committee on economic affairs,
while MFA Permanent Secretary Krit Garnjana-Goonchorn sits on
the advisory committee on foreign affairs. (Comment: Given
the plan for a transition in coming days to a new regime
under an interim constitution, with the formation of a new
cabinet reportedly imminent, it is unclear why the CDR needs
to establish these bodies, particularly as some cover
subjects reportedly outside of the realm of the CDR,s
planned successor body, the Security Council. One possible
explanation: the formation of these committees may be
intended to co-opt potential critics of the military coup –
or to publicly signal short-listed candidates for the next
cabinet. If so, it hasn\’t worked very well, since several
have indignantly refused to serve on the committees. End
Comment.)
BANGKOK 00005949 002 OF 002
MFA RUMORS
———-
5. (C) A regular MFA contact said that Senator Kraisak
Choonhavan, rumored as a longshop candidate for Foreign
Minister, is not well regarded among the MFA rank and file.
He suggested that most of his colleagues are hoping that
either Vitthaya Vejjajiva or Tej Bunnag will be named interim
Foreign Minister. Tej, former Thai Ambassador to Washington,
Beijing and Paris is regarded by many Thai diplomats as being
a serious bureaucrat capable of managing relations with both
the United States and China. Both Tej and Vitthaya were
placed on the foreign affairs advisory committee (see para
5); Kraisak was not.
6. (C) Our source also speculated that several senior
diplomats will be hurt by Thaksin\’s departure. Four who may
be affected include AMB Jullapong Nonsrichai, presently the
Thai AMB in Beijing, who was supposed to go to London as
Ambassador where he was expected to keep an eye on Thaksin\’s
interests; London DCM Bansarn Bunnag, former chief of staff
to Surakiart, who was slated to be the next AMB to Burma
(Note: He\’s in trouble for links to Thaksin and for picking
Thaksin up in London last week at the airport in a Thai
Embassy limo flying the Thai flag); Information Section DDG
Maris Sangiampol who had been seconded to Thaksin\’s staff for
some time and who was slated to become an Ambassador without
portfolio, and; Piraya Khempol who is former deputy Prime
Minister Surakiart Sathirathai\’s Chief of Staff and who was
also supposed to become a Minister without portfolio.
THANKS, AND HERE\’S YOUR HAT
—————————
7. (U) Several well-known jurists who worked on the draft
interim constitution have officially withdrawn from any
advisory role for the CDR. Borwornsak Uwanno and his cousin
Wissanu Krea-Ngam are both highly respected for their legal
acumen, but have been strongly criticized for serving in the
Thaksin government. Both resigned in recent months, but
apparently not soon enough to salvage their reputations
completely. We understand that they will continue to assist
with legal advice, behind the scenes. Meechai Ruchuphan, who
helped draft previous post-coup constitutions, has also
withdrawn from any formal role, in response to public
criticism. The draft constitution is already being reviewed
by other leading academics, in any case.
THREE SCHOOLS BURNED
——————–
8. (U) Three schools were burned in Kamphengphet province
(northwest of Bangkok) on the night of September 26.
Although the press speculates that this was some kind of
protest against the coup, our police contacts in the province
say they are still investigating the causes. (Comment:
Kamphengphet is not a hotbed of pro-Thaksin feeling, and
burning schools does not seem like the most obvious way to
show displeasure with the coup. The press reaction does
demonstrate, again, that fear of some kind of counter-coup is
quite widespread, despite the complete lack of opposition to
the coup so far. End comment.)
WHERE ARE THEY NOW?
——————-
9. (C) Several sources confirm that former Defense Minister
Thamarak is \”under the control of the CDR.\” According to an
MOD source, Thamarak is at his own home, and has been asked
to stay there.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5939 LIFE BEFORE THE COUP – EC COURT VERDICT
“79791″,”9/27/2006 4:40″,”06BANGKOK5939″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,”CONFIDENTIAL”,”",”VZCZCXRO1322
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHBK #5939 2700440
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 270440Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1919
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC”,”C O N F I D E N T I A L
BANGKOK 005939
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/26/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, TH
SUBJECT: LIFE BEFORE THE COUP – EC COURT VERDICT
REF: BANGKOK 4490 (COURT CONVICTS ELECTION
COMMISSIONERS)
Classified By: Political Counselor Susan M. Sutton, Reasons 1.4 (B,D)
1. (U) Days before the coup, the Criminal Court found the
three former Election Commissioners (EC) guilty of electoral
law violations during their oversight of the annulled April 2
elections. Specifically, the court ruled on September 15
that the Commissioners purposefully stalled action on the
Democrat Party\’s allegation that Prime Minister Thaksin\’s
Thai-Rak-Thai Party (TRT) bankrolled small parties to
participate in that election. Each received two-year jail
sentences plus a ten-year revocation of voting rights, and
each was released on bail for 120,000 baht (USD 3250) pending
appeal within thirty days. This is the second guilty verdict
rendered against the former EC (reftel).
2. (C) While the first verdict has been appealed by all
three individuals, court officials could not confirm whether
appeals have been filed for the second verdict. They could
only confirm that both cases remain ongoing in the judiciary
and commented that the coup does not affect either of the
cases.
3. (C) Comment: The coup has put \”on hold\” various court
cases from both pro- and anti-Thaksin factions. This verdict
is worth noting now for two reasons: first, it provides
further corroboration for the argument that the April
election was seriously flawed, and that the Election
Commissioners were not acting impartially. Second, the
court\’s verdict also shows that there was some progress being
made, within the framework of the 1997 Constitution and Thai
law, in pushing back against Thaksin\’s control. End comment.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5929 THAI OFFICIALS PLEA FOR UNDERSTANDING
“79700″,”9/26/2006 11:02″,”06BANGKOK5929″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,”CONFIDENTIAL”,”06BANGKOK5894″,”null
Debra P Tous 09/27/2006 10:12:46 AM From DB/Inbox: Debra P Tous
Cable
Text:
C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 05929
SIPDIS
CXBKKSVR:
ACTION: POL
INFO: TSA AMB CHRON CONS DAO DATTLO DCM ECON JTF
JUSMAG NAS PA RMA SA RSO
DISSEMINATION: POL1
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: AMB:BOYCERL
DRAFTED: POL:SUTTONSM
CLEARED: DCM: ARVIZUAA
VZCZCBKI062
OO RUEHC RUEHZS RUEHBY RUEHUL RHEFDIA RHHMUNA
RHHMUNA RHFJSCC RUCPDOC RUEATRS RUEAIIA
DE RUEHBK #5929/01 2691102
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 261102Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1909
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 6089
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 2140
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC”,”C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BANGKOK 005929
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
TREASURY PASS TO FRB SAN FRANCISCO/TERESA CURRAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/25/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, TH
SUBJECT: THAI OFFICIALS PLEA FOR UNDERSTANDING
REF: BANGKOK 05894 (NEW CONSTITUTION DRAFTER BRIEFS
AMBASSADOR)
Classified By: Ambassador Ralph L. Boyce, reason 1.4 (b) (d)
1. (C) SUMMARY: The MFA permanent secretary and the ruling
military council\’s Secretary General reassured the diplomatic
corps that Thailand would return to democratic rule as soon
as possible. The Secretary General personally assured the
Ambassador during a pull-aside that a civilian prime minister
would be named by Sunday. The Thai side asked for
understanding from Thailand\’s \”friends\” for the special
circumstances here. They laid our a timetable for the return
to elected government:
– an interim constitution by Friday
– an interim PM within the promised two week window
– quick establishment of a constitution drafting committee
– \”eight months and 15 days\” for the drafting and review of
the constitution, and its submission in a referendum to the
public
– \”free and fair elections\” within a year from now.
2. (C) Summary continued: The ruling military council will
transform itself into a Council on National Security once it
has transfered power to the interim prime minister and will
retain only limited powers, largely in response to continued
concerns about the possibility of a counter-coup. The
interim civilian government will have an uphill battle to
keep to the timetable for the constitution and elections that
has been promised. End summary.
3. (C) MFA PermSec Krit Garnjana-Goonchorn and NSC Secretary
General Winai Phattiyakul (also SecGen of the Council for
Democratic Reform under the Constitutional Monarchy – CDRM)
called the diplomatic corps for a meeting on 9/25. Krit
admitted that the \”coups are wrong and undesirable\” and
recognized that many might see the situation as \”black and
white.\” But he hoped that diplomats would recognize that
there were gray areas. He pointed out that the \”people as a
whole seem to have welcomed the military intervention.\” He
also emphasized that the CDRM did not want to hold on to
power itself, but would turn over power to an interim
civilian government as soon as possible, hopefully within two
weeks. Many other governments had already passed judgment on
the military intervention; Krit asked that \”friends\” continue
to keep their judgments under review and reconsider them in
the light of new information. Because the transition was
peaceful, Thailand hopes to \”win back the trust of the
international community in our economy and in our deep
commitment to democracy.\”
4. (C) Krit pointed out that the CDRM was already restoring
some on the mechanisms of normal government. The Election
Commission would continue to function, and was \”already
making progress toward free and fair elections.\” The
National Counter-Corruption Commission was empowered to
investigate government corruption issues, along with the
Auditor-General. The CDRM had affirmed that the office of the
Ombudsman still functioned, and could receive complaints from
citizens. The National Human Rights Commission would
continue to carry out its mandate.
A ROSE IS A ROSE IS…
———————-
5. (C) Krit said that the CDRM had learned that the initial
rendering of its title (The Council for Democratic Reform
under the Constitutional Monarchy) had caused
misunderstandings and \”wrongly suggested some role for His
Majesty in the September 19 intervention.\” Therefore, the
official title would now be simply the Council for Democratic
Reform CDR) (reftel) During the Q\’s and A\’s, Krit returned to
the question of the King\’s role. He emphasized that the CDR
had their audience with the King \”after the process of the
takeover\” to report what had happened. \”The King had no
foreknowledge\” of the coup. \”He is above politics. Remember
the past year; he has been cautious not to intervene. He
turned down requests to appoint a prime minister under
Article 7 of the Constitution. That was a clear indication
of how the King applies his role as constitutional monarch.\”
He added, \”We don\’t want any misunderstanding about this –
hence, the name change.\”
TIMELINE FOR RETURN TO ELECTED GOVERNMENT
—————————————–
6. (C) General Winai then laid out the timeline for return to
democratic government. (Note: his presentation closely
mirrored the account we had already received from legal
expert Borwornsak Uwanno – reftel). He also emphasized that
the CDR did not want to hold on to power. They had a legal
advisory group working day and night, and it had completed
the draft interim Constitution. That draft was under
consideration now; deans of the preeminent law faculties of
the country were assisting in the review. The CDR expected
to announce an interim Constitution on September 29. Shortly
thereafter, it would name an interim civilian Prime Minister
and cabinet. (Note: In a pull-aside after the meeting, the
Ambassador emphasized to General Winai how important it was
for the CDR to hold to its announced timetable and transfer
power to a civilian government as soon as possible. Winai
assured the Ambassador that the CDR fully intended to do
this, and predicted that they would be able to name the new
PM by Sunday. end note.) Once the CDR had transfered
authority to the civilian PM, it would become the Council on
National Security, and it would have limited authority
primarily in matters of national security. During the Q\’s
and A\’s, they were questioned again about the role of this
Council. Winai emphasized that the new Council would have a
\”minimal\” mandate to look after national security issues and
ensure that there is a free and fair election. Krit added
that the Council on National Security was necessary to
prevent \”counter-coup efforts.\”
7. (U) The CDR would also name two other bodies. First
would be a legislative body. This would serve as a
Parliament to handle required legislation while the interim
government was in power. The CDR would also name
approximately 2000 people from all walks of life and all
parts of the country, and they would in turn choose 100-200
legal experts who would then draft the new constitution.
8. (U) The drafting process would take six months. The
government would then take one month to example the draft and
consult. It would give the drafting commission 15 days to
make corrections to the draft, and would then prepare to hold
a referendum. They anticipated this would take one month.
According to this timetable, the new constitution would be
ready in \”eight months and 15 days.\” After that, \”free and
fair elections\” would be organized, within one year from now.
ECONOMIC ISSUES
—————-
9. (U) Winai said that there would be minimal economic
impact. The new airport would open on schedule this week,
and the country\’s international trade policy would remain
unchanged, including regarding free-trade agreements.
CIVIL LIBERTIES ISSUES
———————-
10. (U) Winai referred to the many questions about the
restrictions on civil liberties, especially freedom of
assembly. \”Thai hold these freedoms dear,\” he said. He
promised that political activities could be resumed when the
situation returns to normal, and that press freedom would be
restored soon. (During the Q\’s and A\’s, Winai also
underscored that the CDR had not dissolved any political
parties; the parties would be able to participate in the
elections next year.) Winai concluded saying that the \”trust
and confidence of our international partners is necessary for
us to return to normalcy.\”
11. (U) During the Q\’s and A\’s, Winai took the opportunity to
highlight the coup\’s role in forestalling possible further
violence. He refered to a \”concrete intelligence report\”
that some pro-Thaksin forces planned to bring supporters to
Bangkok to confront the opposition rally scheduled for
September 20. Winai claimed that \”violence was imminent\” and
the decision for military intervention had to be made \”to
prevent loss of life.\” It was better to act before a clash
than after, he said.
12. (U) Most questions focused on civil liberties and the
transition to democracy. The Ambassador expressed concern
about the four former officials reportedly detained; he asked
whether they would charged with any offense, or released.
Winai said that the CDR had invited them under its
protection. They would not be charged with any offense, and
they would be allowed to go free \”at an appropriate time.\” He
said that they were not being mistreated, and that their
families were allowed to visit. \”We need to take measures to
keep the situation stable,\” he said. The Australian
ambassador pointed out that the members of the interim
legislature and the 2000-member \”electoral college\” that will
chose the constitution drafting committee were all appointed
by the CDR, through a process that was inherently not
democratic. The UK representative also asked whether these
bodies would have representatives from upcountry, or would
they have largely Bangkok-based participants? Krit responded
that \”everything is under discussion\” and that the CDR
planned to have the widest possible involvement. Another
democratic element would be introduced when the draft
constitution was submitted to a referendum. \”The points you
make are at the forefront of the minds of those deciding,\”
Krit said.
COMMENT
——-
13. (C) The CDR appears to on track for keeping its first big
commitment, setting up the interim constitution and
transferring power to the interim PM. We will continue to
emphasize the importance of keeping to this timetable. We
were struck by a couple of points in the presentation. One
is that some of the CDR decisions are clearly driven by
concerns of a possible counter-coup. This will make the
transition back to full respect for civil liberties more
difficult. Second is the angst over how to portray the
King\’s role. On the one hand, the CDR wants the legitimacy
that comes from the perception that the King has accepted, if
not approved, the coupmakers\’ actions. At the same time,
they do not want to be accused of causing damage to the
King\’s reputation by having exposed him to international
criticism. (The reference to the King as \”an idiot\” by a
reporter asking questions at the State Department briefing
has already excited great concern at the MFA. there is also
lingering concern about the book \”The King Never Smiles\”
which, though banned in Thailand, is on the minds of some.)
We were also struck by the military precision of the
timetable Gen. Winai laid out: precisely eight months and 15
days until the new constitution. The CDR is handing the
interim government a very tough timetable. Getting
Thailand\’s fractious civil society to go along with the CDR\’s
precise timetable, while allowing a return to normal civil
liberties, will be a difficult trick.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5928 THAI MFA PERMSEC CONFIDENT OF MEETING TWO WEEK DEADLINE
“79699″,”9/26/2006 11:02″,
“06BANGKOK5928″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,
“CONFIDENTIAL”,”06BANGKOK5894|06BANGKOK5908″,”null
Debra P Tous 09/27/2006 09:37:24 AM From DB/Inbox: Debra P Tous
Cable
Text:
C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 05928
SIPDIS
CXBKKSVR:
ACTION: POL
INFO: TSA AMB CHRON CONS DAO DATTLO DCM ECON JTF
JUSMAG NAS PA RMA SA RSO
DISSEMINATION: POL1
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: AMB:RLBOYCE
DRAFTED: POL:DRGREENBERG
CLEARED: DCM:AAARVIZU
VZCZCBKI060
OO RUEHC RUEHZS RUEHBY RUEHWL RUEHUL RUEHLO
RHEFDIA RHEHNSC RHHMUNA RUEKJCS RHHMUNA RHHMUNA RHFJSCC RUEAIIA
RUCPDOC RUEATRS
DE RUEHBK #5928/01 2691102
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 261102Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1907
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6087
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 1528
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 2138
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1187
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY”,
“C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 005928
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
TREASURY PASS TO FRB SAN FRANCISCO/TERESA CURRAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/26/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, KDEM, MOPS, ASEC, TH
SUBJECT: THAI MFA PERMSEC CONFIDENT OF MEETING TWO WEEK
DEADLINE
REF: A. BANGKOK 5908 (PREM ON TRANSITION)
B. BANGKOK 5894 (BORWORNSAK ON CONSTITUTION)
Classified By: Ambassador Ralph L. Boyce, reason 1.4 (d).
SUMMARY
——-
1. (C) MFA Permanent Secretary Krit Garnjana-Goonchorn said
the King would sign Thailand\’s interim constitution on
September 29. In a September 26 meeting with the Ambassador,
Krit said this constitution would provide for the Council for
Democratic Reform (CDR) to become a new Security Council,
operating as a type of caretaker government until the
swearing-in of a civilian cabinet. The civilian Prime
Minister would be publicly known as early as the weekend of
September 30-October 1, but he and his full cabinet might not
be inaugurated until a week later. The Ambassador stressed
the importance of a transition to civilian government within
the CDR\’s self-imposed two week deadline. Krit said one of
the first acts of the new civilian government would be to
lift martial law. He acknowledged the legitimacy of USG
statements expressing disappointment with the coup, but hoped
the USG would take an encouraging tone to help Thailand set
itself back on a democratic path. End Summary.
TIME FRAME FOR TRANSITION
————————-
2. (C) The Ambassador opened his September 26 call on MFA
Permanent Secretary Krit by mentioning that he had met
September 25 with Council for Democratic Reform (CDR — the
council formerly known as CDRM) member General Winai and
stressed the importance of meeting the CDR\’s self-imposed two
week deadline for a transition to a civilian administration.
The Ambassador also described his phone conversation with
Privy Council President Prem Tinsulanonda on the subject (ref
A). Krit foresaw no problems meeting that deadline, saying
the CDR was \”pretty confident\” and had been working
diligently on transition issues. Krit noted CDR leader
General Sonthi had opened a meeting of the \”phantom cabinet\”
on the morning of September 26 by remarking that would be the
first and last meeting of the group.
3. (C) Krit said the King would sign the interim constitution
on Friday, September 29. At that time the CDR per se would
cease to exist. In its place would come into being a
\”Security Council\” (presumably composed of the CDR\’s members)
that would exist separate from Thailand\’s longstanding
National Security Council (which is under the Office of the
Prime Minister). The Security Council\’s activities would be
prescribed and limited by the interim constitution. During a
brief transition period, until the swearing-in of the new
cabinet (consisting of the PM plus 35 persons), the interim
constitution would provide for the Security Council to act as
a caretaker administration, although it would operate with
the very limited goal of keeping the government functioning;
the Security Council would be \”even more minimal than a
caretaker government.\” Krit indicated it could take a week
between the promulgation of the interim constitution and the
swearing-in of the new cabinet, although he predicted that
the identity of the civilian Prime Minister would be made
public by the weekend of September 30-October 1, or, at the
latest, early in the week of October 2-6.
4. (C) One of the first acts of the new civilian Prime
Minister\’s administration would be to repeal marital law,
Krit said. (Note: Although the CDR has issued numerous
proclamations restricting civil liberties, it has never been
made clear exactly what \”martial law\” under the CDR entailed.
End Note.) Krit commented that General Sonthi had remarked
privately, \”I don\’t know what it (martial law) is for,
anyway.\” After the inauguration of the new cabinet, Krit
said, the Security Council would \”fade to the background,\”
although still exercising certain limited functions. Krit
initially suggested waiting to see how the interim
constitution would define those functions, although when the
Ambassador shared a readout from constitution drafter
Borwornsak (ref B), Krit agreed that Borwornsak\’s description
(in which the CDR nominates the cabinet and retains emergency
powers to deal with a counter-coup or southern militancy)
tracked with his own understanding.
USG STATEMENTS
————–
5. (C) Krit acknowledged he could not take offense at
statements by USG officials who expressed disappointment over
the coup. However, he hoped for a positive tone in future
remarks. Thailand had stumbled while on the road to
democratization, he said, and now needed a helping hand to
help pull the Thais back up. (Comment: Krit did not indicate
clearly whether he viewed the coup as the stumble, or what
many considered the increasingly authoritarian methods of
Thaksin Shinawatra. End Comment.) It served no one\’s
interests to keep Thailand \”in the diplomatic doghouse,\” and
Krit hoped that Thailand would be encouraged to resume its
former role as a leading country in Southeast Asia. Krit
also hoped that any announcement of a cutoff of American
assistance to Thailand would also take positive note of
actions taken by the Thais to restore civilian rule.
6. (C) Director General for American Affairs Nongnuth
Phethcaratana drew the Ambassador\’s attention to a September
20 statement by Senator Biden (available at www.senate.gov)
that not only criticized the coup (as a \”setback for the
cause of democracy\”) but also made explicit references to the
King. Although Senator Biden\’s references were generally
positive, Nongnut believed it inappropriate to refer to the
King in such statements. Krit also suggested that the State
Department spokesman reprimand a journalist who made
insulting remarks about the King in State Department press
briefings. If a reprimand was not possible, Krit recommended
at least an explicit comment from the spokesman to the
journalist noting that the Department disapproved of his
\”abusive\” language.
FTAS
—-
7. (C) The Ambassador asked about a September 25 remark by
CDR member General Winai that the RTG would maintain its
policy on free trade agreements (septel). Krit said he
believed the reference was to the Thai-Japanese free trade
agreement, or perhaps to ongoing negotiations in an ASEAN
context — not to the U.S.-Thailand FTA.
COMMENT
——-
8. (C) Krit appeared comfortable and confident that the CDR
would put Thailand back on the democratic path. However,
according to the timeline he described, he seems to believe
civilian rule begins with the promulgation of the interim
constitution, which will have transitional provisions
enabling the Security Council to act as a type of caretaker
government. The swearing-in of the new Prime Minister and
his cabinet may take place after the two-week mark.
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5908 PRIVY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PREM DISCUSSES TRANSITION
“79646″,”9/26/2006 4:10″,”06BANGKOK5908″,
“Embassy Bangkok”,”CONFIDENTIAL”,”",”VZCZCXRO3412
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #5908 2690410
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 260410Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1894
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6086
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 1527
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI PRIORITY”,
“C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 005908
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/25/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, KDEM, MOPS, ASEC, TH
SUBJECT: PRIVY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PREM DISCUSSES TRANSITION
REF: A. BANGKOK 5894 (BORWORNSAK BRIEFS AMBASSADOR)
B. BANGKOK 5814 (SONTHI BRIEFS ENVOYS)
Classified By: Ambassador Ralph L. Boyce, reason 1.4 (d).
1. (C) I spoke with Privy Council President Prem Tinsulanonda
September 25, explaining I wanted to check on his well-being,
given reports on the night of the coup that Thaksin had tried
to arrange Prem\’s arrest. Sounding relaxed, confident, and
very pleased with the course of events, Prem assured me he
was well.
2. (C) I mentioned to Prem my conversation earlier in the day
with constitution drafter Borwornsak Uwanno (ref A), noting
Borwornsak had indicated the CDRM might not appoint a
civilian Prime Minister until the middle of the first week of
October. I stressed to Prem that the international community
would be watching the clock, and the CDRM would come under
criticism if it missed its self-imposed two-week deadline for
transitioning to a civilian administration. Prem urged me to
start counting the days from September 20, rather than
September 19, as the CDRM needed to buy itself as much time
as possible to get affairs in order. (Note: Sonthi first
mentioned the two week time frame midday on September 20 –
ref B. End Note.)
BOYCE
“
06BANGKOK5895 THAILAND UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 25
“79552″,”9/25/2006 11:10″,
“06BANGKOK5895″,”Embassy Bangkok”,
“CONFIDENTIAL”,”06BANGKOK5463|06BANGKOK5747|06BANGKOK5834|06BANGKOK5874″,
“null
Debra P Tous 09/27/2006 10:18:17 AM From DB/Inbox: Debra P Tous
Cable
Text:
C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 05895
SIPDIS
CXBKKSVR:
ACTION: POL
INFO: TSA AMB CHRON CONS DAO DATTLO JTF JUSMAG NAS PA
RMA SA DCM ECON RSO
DISSEMINATION: POL1
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: DCM:ARVIZUAA
DRAFTED: POL:GREENBERGDR
CLEARED: POL:SUTTONSM, ECON:JCAROUSO
VZCZCBKI995
OO RUEHC RUEHZS RUEHBY RUEHUL RUEHWL RHEHNSC
RHEFDIA RHHMUNA RHHMUNA RHFJSCC RUCPDOC RUEATRS RUEAIIA
DE RUEHBK #5895/01 2681110
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 251110Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1881
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 6082
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 2131
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 1524
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC”,
“C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BANGKOK 005895
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
TREASURY PASS TO FRB SAN FRANCISCO/TERESA CURRAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/24/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, PREL, MOPS, KDEM, ASEC, TH
SUBJECT: THAILAND UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 25
REF: A. BANGKOK 5874 (CONTINUED CALM)
B. BANGKOK 5834 (RETURNING TO NORMAL)
C. BANGKOK 5747 (HAT YAI BOMBING)
D. BANGKOK 5463 (BORWORNSAK ASSESSES THAKSIN)
Classified By: DCM Alexander A. Arvizu, reason 1.4 (b) and (d)
1. (C) SUMMARY: The Council for Democratic Reform Under the
Constitutional Monarchy (CDRM) banned both wiretapping and
political activities against the interests of the CDRM.
Television broadcasts have featured the coup leaders
receiving the Royal Command that gave the King\’s imprimatur
to their seizure of power. The CDRM has appointed members of
the National Counter Corruption Commission and a special
panel to investigate corruption during the Thaksin
administration. A September 23 roadside bomb in Pattani
province marked the first significant act of political
violence since the coup. An MFA official dismissed rumors of
a Burmese high-level visit to Thailand. The CDRM\’s search
for a civilian Prime Minister continues. End Summary.
CDRM UPDATE – MORE GOOD NEWS AND BAD NEWS
—————————————–
2. (C) The CDRM issued Public Announcement 21, banning
illegal eavesdropping/wiretapping of telephones or other
communications. This announcement appears to be in response
to the widespread fears (which we believe were justified)
that Thaksin and his supporters were using their control of
the largest cellphone operator to eavesdrop on their
political opponents (ref D). In Public Announcement 22, the
CDRM advised all administrative and political organizations
on the local level which \”disagree with the CDRM\” to \”stop
their political movements or activities until the situation
in the country is back to normal.\” Nevertheless, press
reports indicated students and university lecturers in
Bangkok would hold an anti-coup political discussion at
Bangkok\’s Thammasat University late on the afternoon of
September 25.
RECEIPT OF ROYAL COMMAND TELEVISED
———————————-
3. (C) All television stations simultaneously broadcast a
September 22 ceremony at which CDRM leader General Sonthi and
other CDRM figures received the Royal Command empowering the
CDRM to run the government (ref B). The King does not appear
in person for such ceremonies, however. Thai television has
yet to broadcast video footage of the King subsequent to his
August 4 release from a local hospital. Meanwhile, a Chinese
journalist from Guangming Daily informed us that the Thai MFA
protested a Xinhua News Agency story that linked the coup
with the monarchy, and Xinhua was in the process of formally
apologizing for the report.
CORRUPTION INVESTIGATIONS TO MOVE FORWARD
—————————————–
4. (C) The CDRM on September 22 appointed the members of the
National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC), to be headed
by Panthep Glanarongran, who formerly headed a royal
development foundation. (Note: The NCCC, one of the
independent agencies featured in the now-abolished 1997
Constitution, had not been operative since May 2005, when its
members resigned en masse after a legal determination of
wrongful action in connection with an attempt to raise their
own pay. End Note.) Embassy contacts in the NGO community
have generally characterized the new NCCC as credible,
although noting Panthep may not be the strongest figure to
chair it. One member of the new NCCC suggested publicly that
the NCCC would prioritize investigation of the purchase from
General Electric of CTX explosives detection equipment for
the new Bangkok airport. Besides appointing the NCCC
members, the CDRM also established a new eight-member panel
to focus solely on corruption in projects approved by the
Thaksin administration.
EDITORS KEEP AN EYE ON FTAS
—————————
5. (C) Since the coup, various editorial comments in the
press have warned disapprovingly that the CDRM might conclude
free trade agreements with foreign governments. (Note: An
FTA with Japan has been awaiting the Prime Minister\’s
signature since early 2006. End Note.) We believe the media
is primarily voicing concern in order to pre-empt any impulse
by the CDRM to use FTAs to gain foreign favor; we have no
reason to believe the media has detected concrete indicators
of CDRM interest in concluding FTAs. Numerous Embassy
contacts in the finance sector tell us the CDRM is highly
unlikely to take controversial steps or undertake major
initiatives in the economic realm.
SEVEN DAY CLOCK ON DETENTIONS
—————————–
6. (C) In a September 25 meeting organized by the EU
delegation in Thailand to discuss human rights issues,
including those related to the recent coup, Somchai Homlaor
of the Lawyers Council of Thailand outlined some of the
CDRM\’s restrictions of civil liberties. In discussing the
cases of four prominent pro-Thaksin TRT politicians (ref A),
Somchai noted there are currently no declared charges against
them. Thai law stipulates that detainees would need to be
released within seven days unless criminal charges are filed.
(Note: Prommin Lertsuridej and Chidchai Vanasatidya have
been detained since September 19; Yongyuth Tiyapairat and
Newin Chidchob since September 23. End note.)
BOMBING IN THE SOUTH
——————–
7. (C) Midday on September 23, a roadside bomb injured four
policemen in the Muslim-majority province of Pattani. This
marked the first significant act of political violence in
southern Thailand since the September 19 coup. According to
press reports, the Pattani United Liberation Organization
(PULO) — one of a half-dozen secessionist groups in southern
Thailand — has publicly supported the coup, and Yala Islamic
Committee Deputy Chairman Nimu Makaje also publicly stated
that the coup could mark the beginning of reconciliation
between southern Thailand\’s Muslim population and the
country\’s Buddhist majority. Meanwhile, the authorities have
arrested two suspects in the September 16 Hat Yai bombings
(ref C).
BURMA VISIT UNLIKELY
——————–
8. (C) Kallayana Vipattipumiprates, Acting Director of the
MFA division responsible for Burmese affairs, told us on
September 25 that, contrary to rumor, Burmese Army
Commander-in-Chief Maung Aye would not/not visit Thailand in
the near future.
RUMOR CONTROL
————-
9. (C) In the past few days, there has been widespread
speculation in the press and on the internet that the
generals\’ coup was in fact a move to pre-empt a coup that
Thaksin was planning for the following day. These appear to
be nothing more than an effort at a post-facto justification
of the coup by journalists, who are supporting the coup
because they hated Thaksin, but have a guilty conscience
about it. We note that the generals themselves have not
given this excuse, even in private, and it is clear that the
preparations for the coup started several days at least
before the event. Overall, we put this story in the category
of wishful thinking.
WHO WANTS TO BE A PRIME MINISTER?
———————————
10. (C) Lots of names are circulating as possible interim
Prime Minister, but no one candidate seems to have a clear
lead. Economic contacts say that Band of Thailand Governor
Pridyathorn does not want the job.
WHERE ARE THEY NOW?
——————-
11. (U) Former Agriculture Minister and Thai Rak Thai senior
official Sudarat Keyuraphan has returned to Bangkok from
Brussels with her family. She says she will take a break
from politics.
KINDER, GENTLER COUP – PHOTO OP OF THE DAY
——————————————
12. (U) Everyday, the front page of the various newspapers
show pictures of smiling soldiers receiving flowers from the
public and playing with children. Today\’s best public
relations photo showed a smiling bride and groom in Chiang
Mai, getting their wedding pictures taken in front of a tank.
BOYCE
“
